Campus Ideaz

Share your Ideas here. Be as descriptive as possible. Ask for feedback. If you find any interesting Idea, you can comment and encourage the person in taking it forward.

Trying to Make Long Commutes Disappear

Problem

The traffic congestion due to poor management of signals is a major problem in India. During my daily trips to university and home, I often find myself wasting time at red lights that serve no purpose because there is no traffic at the other intersections. Not only does this delay travel, but it results in wasted fuel, added emissions and unnecessary stress for commuters. Especially near my house , the police have to stop the traffic signal completely and manually control the traffic everyday as there is more traffic on one side of the road.This problem affects me personally as I reach home late almost everyday disrupting my university-life balance. The challenge is more critical with developing cities as the traffic is unmanaged and varying at maximum extent in a day.

What Already Exists

At present, most traffic signals in Indian cities work on pre-fixed timings. The red, yellow and green phases are predetermined according to historical traffic surveys. For instance, the traffic signal may stay green one way for 60 seconds, and the other 30 seconds, with no regard for whether cars are queued up or not. Some cities like Bengaluru, Delhi or Hyderabad have implemented the use of adaptive traffic control systems with pre-deployed sensors, inductive loops and high-resolution cameras. They time themselves in real time according to the flow of vehicles.

Why the solutions are not ideal

Fixed-time systems have become outdated due to their inability to adapt in case of sudden variation like an accident, festival rush or late night empty road. So many vehicles are unnecessarily idling, which leads to increased commute times and wasted fuel. Adaptive solutions available in metro cities, on the other hand, are expensive. The infrastructure of high end cameras, underground sensor loops and networking take a heavy investment and maintenance , in dusty and monsoon India, where power can be irregular , these systems frequently fall apart. When they fail, police officers have to step in the road and manage circulation. This is the opposite of automation. Also, there is no easy way to expand these expensive systems to smaller towns, making a majority of the country with inefficient fixed time signals.

What We Can Do Better 

With my limited knowledge of programming and algorithms, this is the best solution I can come up with. I studied MySQL and databases in grades 11 and 12, and I feel that this could be a decent approach to solving everyday traffic problems.

A more affordable adaptive solution might be found with less complicated sensors and more intelligent software. Options that are far cheaper than expensive buried loops or state of the art AI cameras, such as: 

  • Infrared vehicle counters: inexpensive, weather-resistant, and easy to mount on poles.

  • Basic CCTV cameras with open-source image recognition: software-based processing reduces hardware cost.

  • RFID readers for buses and emergency vehicles: ensures public transport and ambulances get priority without human help.

  • Solar-powered traffic lights: cuts down electricity bills and prevents signal failures during power cuts.

At the heart of the system will be a MySQL database, which stores traffic information in real-time and over time. Each signal measures: road ID, time, vehicle volume and average headway. The algorithm operates based on these data and questions this data in order to control green light dynamically. Algorithm Outline Input: The number of vehicles on the sensors at each scanned road attached to the signal.

Decision:

If one road has no cars → switch the green light to that with waiting cars immediately.

If there is a queue long enough (Q > Threshold) we should be giving them green.

In the peak periods → apply historical database information to pre-assign longer green times.

Enforce fairness so that no road waits indefinitely.

Output: Automatically update signal cycle, write new timing to the database.

Cost Savings Installation: The cost of infrared sensors and open-source software is significantly lower than that of imported adaptive systems.

Power: Solar lights are energy-saving and environmentally-friendly with high-quality.Solar powered outdoor lights are cost-effective because they are very energy efficient. Reduce your electricity costs and save you money.

While not immune to abuse and damage, LoopBox and Trailblazer are both resistant to dust, moisture and rain. Easy-to-replace sensors mounted above the road are far superior compared to wires that run in a trench under the road.

Scalability: Because it is affordable, this system can be adopted in smaller cities and towns that cannot afford expensive smart-city projects.

Reduced Police Intervention : Presently, traffic police jump signals during peak hours or in case of a signal failure. With this system: Instant detection eliminates the need for officers to be stationed on busy crossroads.

A single monitoring dashboard makes it possible for a few officers to monitor numerous intersections from afar.

Emergency vehicles can be automatically identified with RFID tags, without reliance on manual police cooperation.

Who It Benefits 

This will help a lot of people such as daily commuters (by cutting wait times) , smaller towns where the budget is limited , public transport and emergency vehicles like the ambulance move faster as signals are prioritised , and the traffic police who can focus on solving problems such as taking care of people who have no common sense to follow traffic rules. 

Small sample code on storage of data : 

CREATE TABLE trafficdata (

    signal_id INT,

    road_id VARCHAR(20),

    timestamp DATETIME,

    vehicle_count INT,

    avg_wait_time FLOAT,

    PRIMARY KEY(signal_id, road_id, timestamp)

);

IR vehicle counters (₹2k–5k), basic CCTV with open-source software on Raspberry Pi, and RFID tags for buses/ambulances. Solar-powered units cut energy costs, while a phased rollout installs sensors only on major roads.13713179690?profile=RESIZE_710x

 

Votes: 22
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of campusideaz to add comments!

Join campusideaz

Comments

  • The idea is intriguing, but I'm finding it difficult to picture how it translates in practice.
    Maybe you could elaborate on how the sensors transmit the information to the system and the immediate change in the signal and what that means. You might want to provide a rough cost of the installation of one signal so people can get a good idea if it will be at least somewhat affordable. Perhaps you can develop a small demo/animation of it working; this would help people to visualize your concept.
  • It is quite important to note that this system also serves towns of lesser size, not only metropolitan areas.
    The public, in particular, tends to ponder only metropolitan centers, although the real issue is much worse in mid-sized towns. That makes your idea unique.You could even suggest a "phased rollout" option starting at a few key intersections and expanding from there , or it would show a clear precedented planning, and that your approach is practical and appropriate, rather than just hypothetical and theoretical. You could also discuss how to use data from the pilot program to enhance the algorithm, before expanding the program to include the entire city.
    For Sale Page
  • The idea you presented really exemplified efficiency at a cost effective level.I liked your rationale for selecting the simplest / most robust hardware.One possible improvement might be to mention how the system accounts for fair queues among lanes during high congestion. This would be a touch of sophistication in a relatively simple algorithmic control.
  • You encompassed commuters, public transport, ambulances, small towns, and police which covers a nice range. I thought the point about police focusing on rule enforcement instead of standing in traffic is especially good.Again, you could bring in another trend observation that would show how businesses , e.g. delivery services would have faster, more reliable travel times based on your solution. That would expand your impact section even further since it would demonstrate not only how your solution supports individuals but how it could bolster the overall city economy.
  • I appreciate how you itemized cost, ₹2k-5k sensors, Raspberry Pi, etc. You make it believable that you can scale the system down to smaller towns. You should consider throwing in a side note about maintenance , e.g replacing a sensor takes just minutes instead of digging up a road. That makes a very strong contrast.
  • The steps in decision making you've suggested of no cars → skip, threshold → extend green, fairness rule are very intuitive and seem reasonable. The treatment of fairness in particular is important, because often people will complain that they are "stuck forever" in one light. I would also like to see how the edge cases are handled. For example, if we had a sensor failure what would happen? Would the system go into fixed-time mode?
  • The concept of your MySQL database is simple yet effective. The sample table brings to life the idea of how the data may store. You could illustrate the paper with their own example; for instance, you could illustrate how the algorithm updates the green light if 20 cars are at road A and 3 cars are at road B. This would definitely enhance the semi-concrete logic.
  • Your organization , problem, solution, and benefits allows your work to be easy to follow.
    I appreciated the way you justified the use of MySQL when compared to more complicated ai systems. However, the algorithm could have been described with an example, or a small dataset, to show how it would work. That would help readers visualize how the adjustments are actually being made in real time.
  • You have done a nice job of outlining what already exists (fixed signals and adaptive systems in environments such as metro systems) and why those approaches are inadequate. The comparison adds additional support for a better possible case. You might also quickly propose some numbers for example, the cost of AI cameras per intersection to show difference in affordability.
  • You've selected a nostalgia-inducing issue that most people in India can relate to! By sharing a personal story (your commute being delayed every day, police staff operating traffic), you have added a richer sense of validity. The more personal angle is a good hook , keep this in!
This reply was deleted.