Campus Ideaz

Share your Ideas here. Be as descriptive as possible. Ask for feedback. If you find any interesting Idea, you can comment and encourage the person in taking it forward.

People are often unaware if election-related promises are fulfilled. Politicians aren't reviewed like products or services; sometimes a Zomato restaurant feels more accountable than a minister. People lose interest and question whether their votes actually have an impact when there is a lack of transparency.

There aren’t any platforms where citizens can track their leaders, rate their promises or verify their promised delivery. Information is always scattered, biased, or buried, which makes governance unclear making it lack transparency.

Electra is a platform that allows citizens to view, rate, and track promises in real-time, making accountability into a reliable system. It is similar to Yelp or IMDb, but for politics.

This platform includes the following features:

  • Leader Profiles: Each politician will have an active profile that displays their accomplishments, pledges, and public opinion.
  • Issue-Based Reviews: allows the users to rank the quality of services in important areas such as infrastructure, safety, healthcare, and employment.
  • Fact-Check Layer: AI recognizes promises from misleading information by comparing statements to official data.
  • Election Mode: Voters are provided with clear insight into who truly succeeds by viewing live ratings, performance scores, and past performances prior to casting their ballots.
  • Performance Feedback: Leaders receive honest, open feedbacks; underperforming leaders experience a decline in their scores, which may affect their eligibility in the future.

This platform benefits:

  • Voters: All voters can hold politicians accountable and make educated decisions by gaining clear, up-to-date facts about their leaders performances. Because citizens can monitor the real implementation of those promises and every vote gains significance.
  • Honest leaders: They Gain reputation as well as global trust by keeping their word. Since everyone can see their results and transparency, more leaders tend to get inspired to act responsibly.
  • Civil society: Benefits from more transparency and citizen involvement, which lowers corruption and creates an environment where government is transparent, accountable as well as trackable.

As a student, I feel that leaders take pleasure of their fame and authority without taking responsibility. Why can't the public review politicians like they can review movies and apps? Electra gives people a voice beyond election day.

AI + crowdsourced reviews + blockchain ensures ratings can’t be faked or manipulated.

13715123490?profile=RESIZE_400x

Votes: 38
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of campusideaz to add comments!

Join campusideaz

Comments

  • During elections, I have seen how people in my own city get excited when leaders promise to build new roads, jobs, or better facilities, but after a few months, everything falls silent. Since there is no way to monitor what is actually done, even my parents have stopped believing most of what politicians say. I was drawn to Electra because it seems like something that might finally make that change. still concerned that some leaders could create updates or alter the truth to appear good. In order to show the truth from both sides, I believe it would be fantastic if Electra allowed users to upload authentic images or reports as evidence.
  • As a medical professional who has been voting for a few years, I often think about how little we know regarding whether our leaders keep their promises. It's tough to tell the difference between political noise and what's really going on. That sounds like something that Electra could really make easier, giving people like me a quick and reliable way to see who's really working for the public. The platform should also have short, checked summaries of important healthcare promises. This is something that many of us worry deeply about.
    • You're right, healthcare is one of the most important areas where promises are often broken. I really like your idea of adding checked summaries that focus on important areas like education, healthcare, and infrastructure. I will definitely try adding a feature that lets users see issue-based updates that are specific to their interests. This way people can easily keep up with progress in these areas that affect your field.
  • Since I've witnessed how false information may spread during elections in my hometown, I truly relate to Electra. Better roads were promised by a candidate a few years ago, but nothing ever materialized, and we had no way of knowing that the promises had been broken. This type of pointless rhetoric would end if Electra could maintain an authenticated record of what leaders say and do. A timeline of promises versus delivery is one feature I'd really like to see so we can see who actually followed through.
    • I appreciate you sharing that, and I get what you're saying. I created Electra specifically to address situations like the one you described. Because it is difficult to determine whether promises made by leaders have been fulfilled, a lot of people lose faith in them. Your suggestion of a "timeline of promises versus delivery" is a really good one; it's a very strong and open feature. In order to give citizens a visual representation of a leader's progress over time, I will definitely work to incorporate that . The intention is to prevent similar experiences from happening again and to ensure that all public promises are documented, validated, and simple to adhere to.
  • Electra sounds awesome! Since no one truly knows what happens after elections, politics has always seemed really confusing and kind of pointless to me—I just turned 18 years old. However, this concept actually gives us a feeling that our opinions count. Voting would be much more confident for me if I could see which leaders fulfill their promises and which don't. It's like at last being able to see the truth instead of just advertisements and speeches.
  • During elections back home, I commonly witnessed leaders make ambitious promises that were never fulfilled. Since there was no way to verify what was actually accomplished, people simply accepted it. Now that I'm studying in Australia, I've observed how simple it is for locals to obtain government information online, including election records, project updates, and spending by the government through official documents . It demonstrates how openness increases trust between followers and leaders. For this reason, I believe Electra has the potential to change this sector. It would help fill that gap and increase people's sense of involvement in the governance of their nation if there was something similar back home.
  • Electra is such an intriguing concept. It at last gives politics a sense of openness and accessibility. I like how it makes it simpler to identify sincere leaders by fusing verified facts with citizen opinions. This type of platform has the potential to restore public confidence in politicians.
  • There is so much potential in this concept! You might consider how Electra might convince politicians to use the platform. The platform might become more interactive and demonstrate to the public that their opinions are valued if leaders directly share updates or reply to criticism. Knowing that people are actively observing and anticipating responses may also inspire leaders to perform better.
    • It's a very valid point. Indeed, leaders may attempt to post false information or exaggerate, which is why Electra won't rely solely on their statements. Before any claim is included in their profile, it will be verified by independent fact-checking, official data, and even citizen reports. However, Electra wants to allow politicians to directly address criticism and recommendations on the platform. In order to maintain fairness, their answers will be presented alongside validated information and public comments, allowing individuals to view both viewpoints and make their own decisions. Leaders are given a voice in this way, but they are unable to change the facts.
This reply was deleted.